跳到内容
Human Rights Measurement InitiativeHuman Rights Measurement Initiative
  • 简体中文
    • English
    • Français
    • Español
    • Português
    • Русский
    • العربية
    • हिन्दी
    • 한국어
    • বাংলাদেশ
    • ไทย
    • Tiếng Việt
    • 繁體中文
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Nepali
    • தமிழ்
    • සිංහල
    • қазақша
    • Кыргыз тили
  • 使用我们的数据扩张
    • 探索数据
    • 方法
    • 国家亮点
    • 可持续发展目标(SDGs)数据
    • 普遍定期审议的数据
  • 我们的影响扩张
    • 必须更好的数据
    • 实务操作
    • 媒体中的人权数据
  • 参与其中扩张
    • 捐款
    • 帮助我们扩展 — 国家
    • 帮助我们扩展 — 权利
    • 资源
  • 关于我们扩张
    • 我们开展何种工作
    • 新闻和活动
    • 时事通讯简报
    • 出版物
    • 资金与支持
    • 常见问题
    • 联系HRMI

  • 简体中文
    • English
    • Français
    • Español
    • Português
    • Русский
    • العربية
    • हिन्दी
    • 한국어
    • বাংলাদেশ
    • ไทย
    • Tiếng Việt
    • 繁體中文
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Nepali
    • தமிழ்
    • සිංහල
    • қазақша
    • Кыргыз тили

Human Rights Measurement InitiativeHuman Rights Measurement Initiative

Impact story: Aotearoa New Zealand

27 9 月 202211 5 月 2023

Getting the government’s attention in New Zealand

We often say that ‘leaders are moved by numbers’, so getting our numbers in front of decision-makers is crucial. We were really pleased to see the strong press attention to our 2022 human rights scores for New Zealand.

The data

The economic and social rights scores show that Aotearoa New Zealand is a long way from meeting its obligations – and that it could be doing so much more, even without more resources.

For example, Aotearoa New Zealand is doing 85.3% of what it could be doing, with the resources it currently has, to guarantee the right to education. It is falling short of its obligations to devote its maximum available resources to protect Quality of Life rights.

Our data also document huge inequities, with Māori, Pacific people, disabled people, and anyone in poverty much more likely to be missing out on their basic rights. See the data on the right to education below.

67% of our human rights experts identified Indigenous people as being at risk of having their right to education violated. The government is not fulfilling its obligation to protect the right to education for all people.

The coverage

The NZ Human Rights Commission made a public statement on the scores, with comments from each of the Commissioners. Amnesty International Aotearoa New Zealand also put out a press release on the scores.

Leading news outlet in Aotearoa New Zealand, Stuff, published a front page article on NZ’s alarming human rights record, including an interview with Chief Human Rights Commissioner Paul Hunt.

For several days after, HRMI’s NZ scores appeared in news outlets such as:

  • The New Zealand Herald
  • TV3 News Hub
  • 1 News
  • News Talk ZB
  • The Kākā
  • Stuff NZ

The response

After all this news coverage, the Minister of Justice issued a public statement responding to the scores – so we know for sure that the most powerful leaders in Aotearoa are having to take into account the public exposure of the country’s poor human rights performance.

If you’d like to create this kind of impact in your country, help us get in touch with the Human Rights Institute/Commission, leading journalists, and human rights experts. Feel free to contact us anytime, we’d love to hear from you and figure out how we can help make leaders around the world pay attention to human rights in their country.

谢谢您对HRMI的关注。您可以在Twitter、YouTube、LinkedIn 和 Facebook 上关注我们,并在 这里订阅不定期的新闻简报。

Twitter Facebook YouTube Linkedin
探索数据

《HRMI隐私权政策》

网站内容 © HRMI。所有内容均通过知识共享署名非商业 4.0 国际公共许可协议授权,另有说明的情况除外。

We'd like to store cookies and usage data to improve your experience.

For any website to function, it is necessary to collect a small amount of user data, so by continuing to use this website, you are consenting to that. To find out more, please read our Privacy Policy

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
  • 使用我们的数据
    • 探索数据
    • 方法
    • 国家亮点
    • 可持续发展目标(SDGs)数据
    • 普遍定期审议的数据
  • 我们的影响
    • 必须更好的数据
    • 实务操作
    • 媒体中的人权数据
  • 参与其中
    • 捐款
    • 帮助我们扩展 — 国家
    • 帮助我们扩展 — 权利
    • 资源
  • 关于我们
    • 我们开展何种工作
    • 新闻和活动
    • 时事通讯简报
    • 出版物
    • 资金与支持
    • 常见问题
    • 联系HRMI
搜索